Showing posts with label Assignment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Assignment. Show all posts

Thursday, September 9, 2010

WWW Lesson Plan Task 3

Level : Form 2 ( intermediate)
Time : 35 minutes (1 period)
Theme : People
Topic: Jobs People Do
Language Content : Reading (Scanning for information)
Aims : To practice reading (scanning for information )
           To practice writing through information transfer from the websites into written task

Technical requirements:
1)      1) One computer per 2 students
2)      2) Internet connection
3)      3) Web browser

Websites :


Preparation :
1)      1) Teacher locates the websites
2)      2) Teacher prepares task sheet
3)      3) Teacher checks the availability of computer access, internet connection, sites and the classroom condition before the lesson.


Procedures :
Set Induction ( 3 minutes)

1)      1) Teacher pastes 2 pictures of working people (picture of a doctor and a teacher) on the board
2)      2)  Teacher asks students about the job scope of both professions

Development (25 minutes)
1)      1) Teacher writes website’s addresses on the board
2)      2) Teacher assigns students to browse the address given
3)      3) Teacher asks students to read on the texts from the websites
4)      4) Teacher distributes worksheet for each student
5)      5) Teacher asks students to work on the task by pairs

Conclusion (5 minutes)
1)      Teacher pastes the answers on the board and students check their answers

Follow-up activity :
1)      Teacher asks students to list down the job prospects of their ambition.
2)      Students may use internet to search further information about their ambition.









Saturday, August 28, 2010

ARTICLE REVIEW - TASK 2





Title: Developing linguistic and cultural perspectives of English as a foreign language through email discussion
Journal: JALT CALL SIG Journal, 2008. Vol.4, No.3,pp 3- 14. (this is the link )
Author:The author is Bahman Gorjian, who is an assistant professor at Islamic Azad University,Iran in TEFL Department, Science and Research Centre. He got his Ph.D in TEFL from the same university.

One of the aims of conducting this research is to investigate whether the usage of email discussion can enhance the learners’ knowledge of second language (L2) culture. The discussion was done in the form of writing short essays within 200-300 of words with discussion on various topics about culture and perspectives.  Another aim is to develop writing skills with appropriate and accurate grammar usage. This study is an experimental study where experiment between control and experimental group was done. There were 400 subjects participated in this study. The subjects were non-native intermediate students majoring in English translation from various courses. They were enrolled in the fall semester in 2007. Their average age was 17. 18 non-native instructors also got involved in this study with the average 12 years of teaching in EFL Department. Their average age was 33. In selecting the two targeted groups, 650 candidates sat for a L2 writing proficiency test from TOEFL. From the 650 candidates, 400 of the most successful scorers selected to join the study. The selected 400 participants then sat for pre test. During the pre test, the participants were needed to write a two-paragraph cultural-oriented essay in order to examine their level of L2 cultural awareness. One group was named with control group and another group was experimental group. In an effort of figuring out the role of email and L2 cultural information transfer, the two groups had to write 12 essays on different topic about culture. One essay had to be written by each participant per week. Both groups received the same topic.  The participants from experimental group had to write the essays via email and control group traditionally handed in their work through hard copy submission. The post test of writing about culture was conducted as final exam to determine how much they have progressed. The selected 18 non-native instructors became the raters and feedback providers. The result of this study shows that the usage of email discussion with the assistance of L2 teachers can give impact on L2 learners’ cultural awareness. Besides that, it gives beneficial outcomes for the learners’ linguistic development and writing skills.

 This research interests me by informing way on how cultural information can be exchanged in an attractive way; via email discussion. While interacting with others via computer technology, learners in the same time can improve their linguistic proficiency as well as their writing skills. If this study does not interact with linguistic elements and stand solely on cultural exchange, this study perhaps fails in gaining my interest. This study was successfully conducted with pre-test and post test among the two groups. In addition, the participation of 18 language instructors was also appropriate in rating the participants’ performance whether they could improve from the study or not. However, the study failed to identify the suitable quantifiable of “culture” measurement. In gauging whether cultural awareness is rising or declining, a specific measurement scale should be applied. Even the L2 teacher who became the raters claimed that the learners showed the progress, the statement cannot be generalized to all. In the future, scrutinize instrument with specific rating scale should be used in achieving the validity of the research findings. Within Malaysian context, email discussion in enhancing linguistic and writing skills of L2 learners is already integrated. I used to experience it when I took part in computer class during primary school. When I was in secondary school, the method was still traditional similar to what had been applied to the control group in this study. In Malaysia, cultural exchange among L2 learners and native speakers is still not fully applied. That is because the major concern of L2 instructors or teachers here is more on the language proficiency attainment rather than the cultural exchange and awareness. This research however can give a new strategy for L2 teachers in motivating the L2 learner to engage in interactive L2 learning in different way. Gaining cultural awareness can be considered as additional outcomes of the strategy but the language attainment should be the main target.


As a conclusion, the application of email in improving linguistic and writing skills should be supported

(785 words)


Friday, July 30, 2010

ESL Website Evaluation

ESL website evaluation ( http://www.english-online.org.uk )

1.     1. What does the application attempt to “teach”?

This website is attempting to teach English for all level starting from young learners until for advance learners. The website provides grammar, writing and listening tasks. Each level has multiple parts of exercise. Each part then, comprises different types of exercises.  However, this website does not emphasize on writing essays and speaking. Sentence writing task is provided.
The website provides suitable form of aids in educating the learners.  For an example, for the young learners, they experience learning through drilling, interactive animations and interesting matching task. Higher level of learners (e.g: beginner and elementary) are provided with video for tutorials together with the exercises based on the videos.
Grammar is not introduced for the young learners but they are introduced with basic introduction of words and alphabetical pronunciation. Grammar explaination for the other levels is quite long and specific and examples are provided so that it makes the content looks full and compact.
The instruction for each exercises are clear and easily understood. Therefore, the confusion on how to get access to the task can be reduced.

2.      2.What sort of things are the application users expected to do with regards to learning content?

Since the webpage I’ve chosen provides listening task, the users need to have audio software for examples media player, real player and winamp media player. These audio players are compatible with the audio format in the website. In addition, the website also requires functioning sound system as for clear pronunciation to be heard. 


3.      3. What sort of computer skills is the application users expected to have in order to operate/access/use the application?

The webpage is easy to be accessed as the users do not have to pay for the fees and registration is not needed. Everyone is free to access the content of the webpage.

There are variety types of task in this webpage. Some of them such as the users have to match words, key in answers, listen to the pronunciation and match it with the pictorial stimuli, fill in the blanks, choose answer in limited time given, identifying grammatical structure as well as writing grammatically correct sentences. These exercises emphasize on drilling as when the learner fail to give correct answer, they have to redo doing the exercises again and again.

In terms of technical part in accessing the content, the website requires minimum computer literacy skills. The users just have to know the basic skills such as dragging, typing and clicking on buttons and words. In order to get access, the users have to get into this website and choose their level and proceed with English teaching or with the exercise. They have options to choose whether to start learning (through notes or video tutorial) or just carry on with the exercises.

4.      4.While you are playing/accessing/assessing the application, does it remind you of anything you do in a classroom, or with a teacher, or with a fellow classmate, or in a self study?

Yes. When I was in standard 4, my cousin bought a new computer. I was so interested to use his computer that time as I already learned some basic computer skills. One day I found a CD and I asked him to play the CD. I didn’t have any idea why the CD didn’t play the cartoon as displayed on the plastic cover. As I gave up on watching the CD, I clicked on the cute buttons displayed on the screen. Soon after, I realized it wasn’t an ordinary CD. My cousin told me that the CD meant for children learning and it is so called CD Rom.  It was my turning point to know learning language also can be based on self directed learning.
I played with the time out game on the website I’ve chosen and finally, I found one similar game like I used to play from the CD Rom and I really like it. It reminds me of being chased by a dog in the CD Rom but in the website, the dog is replaced with a cat.

5.      5. Can you pinpoint some theories of language learning and/or teaching underlying the application?

I did mention earlier on that grammar is elaborated in intricacies rather than simple explaination. From naked eyes, I assumed that this website is designed for student – centered or self directing learning where minimum instruction from teacher is required. As I concern, Silent Way is one pedagogical approach where teacher plays minimum part in teaching. The learners learn through self learning with minimum instruction of the teacher. The process is more to native fluency, practical knowledge of grammar and lesson planned around grammatical items. Yes, it is very true where the major emphasize of this website is on grammatical structure rather than reading and writing.


6.     6.  How well is the constructivist theory or learning applied to the chosen website(s)?

 Constructivism is a theory of learning where the knowledge constructed by knower of the knowledge (http://www.usask.ca, retrieved on July 20th, 2010). Learners on the other hand explore the learning and obtain knowledge based on their exploration by doing tasks.

From the website I’ve evaluated, I could see that the learners learn through experience or “learning by doing” from a variety of different tasks. Learning through reading notes and looking at the examples itself do not necessarily help much in improving the learners’ proficiency. However, this ESL website successfully applied the theory into practice. To support more, grammar explaination is specific, clear instructions are given and self-directed learning is introduced. Therefore, the learners require minimum assistance from the teacher while doing the activities or gaining information on language through this website.


7.      7. In 1980s and early 1990s, there was a debate on ‘whether the computer was “master” of or “slave” to the learning process (Higgins and Johns,1984). In relation to your evaluation – was the computer a replacement for teachers, or merely an obedient servant to students?

I don’t think computer is a replacement for teachers or an obedient servant for students because computer is just part of “helper” in making the learning process becomes meaningful and enjoyable. Teaching and learning process which involving direct connection between the learners and the teacher are definitely the utmost elements in exchanging knowledge. Teaching via computer can be enjoyable for some students but it also can be other way round as students’ needs are multiple and unpredictable. With the notion computer as obedient servant for learners is also unacceptable because learners sometimes rely on teachers in some aspects. For an example, in direct teaching, teachers are actively involved in introducing content, demonstrating skills, directing large groups and so on. In addition, direct teaching (which involves two way interactions between teacher and learners) is one of the strategies which can help in meeting specific objectives of learning outcomes. (Wilen,Hutchison,Ishler;2008)


8.      8. Would you like to use the application yourself in your future work?

Yes. I would somehow use some part of the application especially the exercises in my future career as a teacher. That is because, the exercises are designed based on students’ level of proficiency. The other reason is that, teaching in traditional way in classroom sometimes can make the students feel bored and unmotivated to learn. Using English website with multimedia application can increase their motivation and enthusiasm to learn more. In using the notes provided, I will be more selective as for teaching the secondary school students, point form notes are far better than wordy explaination.

Recommendations

Grammar explaination from this website is long, and the intricacies of grammar elaborations can be seen. The minimization of the elaboration exists but still, the explaination looks too technical. In addition, the form of the explaination looks dry and dull with no colour attraction thus can make the learners not interested to read further. In fact, there is no table at all. However, for those who are searching in depth explaination for grammar, this website can fulfil the need. Again, the errors of spelling should be avoided. Based on the specific comment here, I would like to suggest that the website should provide short and simple explaination so that the rules can be understood easily. One way of doing this is through diagram, tables and so on.

 We need to bear in mind that learner’s proficiency level does not necessarily depend on their age. Therefore, practicality of this website should meet the condition of the learners.

Lastly, I would like to recommend that the website should provide printable exercise so that those who are using computers at school can bring and finish the exercise at home. This makes the website more attractive.
So far, the variety of the exercises already catches my intention to do more and more exercise in the website plus it makes me interested to introduce it to my future students.InsyaAllah.
           











 References :


Spada,N. and Lightbown,P.M. 2008. How Languages are Learned : Explaining second language learning . Oxford University Press

Brown, H.D. 2001. Teaching by Principals : An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. San Francisco State University


Wilen,W. Hutchison,J and Ishler,M. 2008. Dynamics of Effective Secondary Teaching.Sixth Edition. United States of America